Payday Loan Help
“The FTC requests a final judgment of over $43 million in equitable damages and injunctive relief against all defendants.”
YOU are entitled to money thanks to an FTC program launched against the payday loan companies listed below. Check your bank records for any debits processed by any of these companies. READ the name of the ACH processors involved as well. And, if you even THINK you may have been ripped off by a payday loan company, get my book, “How to Kiss Your Payday Loan lender Goodbye” available on Amazon for $2.99! It’s all about payday loan help available to you.
“The FTC argues that this provision is necessary because these defendants “directed many of the scheme’s most unscrupulous practices, including posing as a lender to purchase declined payday loan applications” and “falsely
held themselves out as consumer credit experts” and lenders in order to purchase consumer account information.”
“Section III of the FTC’s proposed order is reasonably related to Jared Mosher, Christopher Sunyich, and Steven Sunyich’s misconduct. This relief is especially appropriate in light of their high-level involvement in the scheme, which preyed on vulnerable customers i.e. payday loan applicants in need of financial assistance while purporting to offer nonexistent financial counseling and services. ”
The Federal Trade Commission sued Ideal Financial Solutions, Inc., its related entities, and the people who control them alleging a wide-ranging fraud scheme in which Ideal, through a host of shell entities, purchased consumer bank and credit card information from payday-loan vendors and charged unwitting consumers a fee for financial services never provided.
The FTC filed this action against Ascot Crossing, LLC; Avanix, LLC; Bracknell Shore, Ltd.; Chandon Group, Inc.; Fiscal Fitness, LLC; and Ideal Financial Solutions, Inc. (corporate defendants); and the people who control them: Kent Brown, Jared Mosher, Christopher Sunyich, Melissa Sunyich Gardner, Michael Sunyich, Shawn Sunyich, and Steven Sunyich (individual defendants), alleging that they orchestrated a fraud scheme using unfair billing practices (count 1), deceptive billing practices (count 2), and deceptive statements that consumers authorized payment (count 3), all in violation of the FTC Act.
Here’s the link to the FTC website, complaint form and $43M settlement: